CASE STUDY · ESG CONSULTANCY · ANONYMIZED (PUBLISHED WITHOUT THE NAME)

$52vs$154

cost per lead vs the industry benchmark. the difference wasn't the ads. it was the offer.

01

the flop.

the first offer was a "free consultation." nobody wanted it. a consultation is a meeting with a stranger. that's a cost, not a gift. the ads weren't the problem. the thing at the end of the click was.

02

the rebuild.

we rebuilt the offer around what these buyers actually wanted to know: are we ready to bid on tenders? the "tender-readiness score" gave them a real answer for 30 seconds of form. same audience. different offer. everything moved:

$52vs $154
CPL vs benchmark, −66%
1.00%vs 0.51%
CTR vs industry avg, +96%
$4.93vs $6.24
CPC vs benchmark, −21%
30
qualified leads in 4 weeks
~$1.5K
total spend
80%
already bidding on tenders
90%
correct seniority
14 days
to build the strategy, validated in 28
03

the smaller levers.

native lead forms beat landing pages by 30 to 60% in low-trust categories. removing the phone field added 6 to 18 leads. but stack every tweak together and it's still smaller than the offer change. the offer is the 10x lever. everything else is tuning.

04

in their words.

"just the clarity we got from the campaign gave us direction we didn't have before: on who responds, how to talk to them, and what to offer."

founder, ESG consultancy (anonymized)

benchmarks are dreamdata's 2025 linkedin numbers. the client is real and the case is public, published without the name, at their request.

05

evidence.

EVIDENCE
30 MQLs in 4 weeks vs the $154 industry benchmark, from the client-facing readout.
30 MQLs in 4 weeks vs the $154 industry benchmark, from the client-facing readout.real campaign manager export
read the full article: i found 4 b2b demand gen levers that matter →

you just read the case. the audit below is the same read, on your account.

leak #5 in our free audit is your offer.

get the free 5-leak audit →

free · 30 minutes · no pitch attached

if the math says no, we tell you no.

4.9 / 5 · 6 named linkedin reviews →
original post →